Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Bhagvanbhai Haribhai Chaudhari vs State Of Gujarat & 3

High Court Of Gujarat|24 July, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Even in second call, learned Advocate for petitioner is not present.
When the petition was called out and taken up for hearing in the first call, learned Advocate for petitioner was not present. Any request for adjournment or passover was also not made. Even in second call, learned Advocate for petitioner is not present and any request for adjournment or passover is not made.
Mr. Vaghela, learned Advocate for respondent was present during first call and even in second call also. He has submitted that two concurrent orders are in favour of the respondent and without any locus, the petitioner, in his capacity as complainant, is HC-NIC Page 1 of 2 Created On Tue Nov 07 23:15:54 IST 2017 SCA/14732/2011 2/2 ORDER prosecuting present petition.
Having regard to absence of learned Advocate for petitioner as well as the petitioner, the petition is disposed of on the ground of non-prosecution.
(K.M.THAKER, J.) jani HC-NIC Page 2 of 2 Created On Tue Nov 07 23:15:54 IST 2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bhagvanbhai Haribhai Chaudhari vs State Of Gujarat & 3

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
24 July, 2012