Court No. - 66
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 32744 of 2019 Applicant :- Bhabhuti And 2 Others Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Pradeep Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajul Bhargava,J.
Heard Sri Pradeep Kumar, learned counsel for the applicants as well as learned A.G.A. appearing for the State and perused the averments made in the first information report and rejection order.
Submission of the learned counsel for the applicants is that the opposite party no.2 has lodged a first information report with the allegation that the applicants had forged the will of his uncle Jagannath in the year 2002 after his death. He further submits that a civil suit has already been instituted by the father of opposite party no.2 in the year 2008 for cancellation of the alleged forged will and it is yet to be decided in the civil proceedings as to whether the same was a forged one or not. The applicants have no other reported criminal antecedent.
Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.
Without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, considering the nature of accusation and the fact that they have no criminal antecedents, the applicants are entitled to be released on anticipatory bail in this case.
In the event of arrest of the applicants- Bhabhuti, Ram Nayan and Swaminath involved in Case Crime No. 97 of 2018, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 504, 506, 452, 323 I.P.C., Police Station- Chowk, District- Maharajganj, they shall be released on anticipatory bail till the submission of police report, if any, under section 173 (2) Cr.P.C. before the competent Court on each of them furnishing a personal bond of Rs. 25,000/- with two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Station House Officer of the police station concerned with the following conditions:-
(i) the applicants shall make themselves available for interrogation by a police officer as and when required;
(ii) the applicants shall not directly or indirectly, make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer;
(iii) the applicants shall not leave India without the previous permission of the Court and if they have passport the same shall be deposited by them before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned.
In default of any of the conditions, the Investigating Officer is at liberty to file appropriate application for cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to the applicants.
The Investigating Officer is directed to conclude the investigation of the present case in accordance with law expeditiously preferably within a period of three months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order independently without being prejudice by any observation made by this Court while considering and deciding the present anticipatory bail application of the applicants.
The applicants are directed to produce a certified copy of this order before the S.S.P./S.P. concerned within ten days from today, who shall ensure the compliance of present order.
The present Criminal Misc. Anticipatory Bail Application is, accordingly, allowed.
Order Date :- 21.8.2019 Vikas