Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Bediram Gupta vs State Of Up And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 March, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 10312 of 2018 Applicant :- Bediram Gupta Opposite Party :- State Of Up And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- K.S. Ojha Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
Learned counsel for the applicant submits that while the FIR had been lodged in the year 2014 and charge sheet has been submitted in the year 2016, the trial has remained pending because the first appearance of the accused has yet not been secured. In this regard, reference has been made in the order sheet to the learned Court below.
Considering the above, the present 482 Cr.P.C. application is disposed of with a direction to the learned Court below to take all coercive measure against the opposite party no.2 as may be permissible in law and to secure attendance of the accused under the pending trial and to seek expeditious disposal of the same without allowing for any long or undue adjournment Order Date :- 29.3.2018 Mini
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bediram Gupta vs State Of Up And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 March, 2018
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • K S Ojha