Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Barsati And Another vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 65
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 16924 of 2019
Applicant :- Barsati And Another
Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Dewarshi Kumar Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Karuna Nand Bajpayee,J.
This application u/s 482 Cr.P.C. has been filed seeking the quashing of charge sheet dated 05.04.2017 (State vs. Natthu and another) as well as the entire proceedings of Criminal Case No.3860 of 2017 arising out of Case Crime No.160 of 2017, under sections 147, 323, 504, 506, 427, 452 I.P.C., Police Station- Shivpur, District- Varanasi, pending in the Court of A.C.J.M., Court No.6, Varanasi.
Heard learned counsel for the applicants.
At the very outset learned counsel for the applicants says that he does not want to press the prayer with regard to quashing of the charge-sheet. Submission is that applicants want to appear before the court below and get themselves bailed out and in that regard some protective direction may be given.
Heard learned A.G.A. and perused the record.
In the light of the submissions made by the counsel this application so far as it seeks quashing of the charge-sheet, stands dismissed.
However, it is observed that if the bail has not been obtained as yet, the accused may appear before the court below and apply for bail within four weeks from today. The court below shall make an endeavour to decide the bail application, if possible, keeping in view the observations made by the Court in the Full Bench decision of Amrawati and another Vs. State of U.P. 2004 (57) ALR 290 and also in view of the decision given by the Hon'ble Supreme Court in the case of Lal Kamlendra Pratap Singh Vs. State of U.P. 2009 (3) ADJ 322 (SC).
In the aforesaid period or till the date of appearance of the accused in the court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive measures shall be taken or given effect to.
It is further clarified that this order has been passed only with regard to the accused on behalf of whom application has been moved in this Court.
With the aforesaid observations this application is finally disposed off.
Order Date :- 29.4.2019/ shiv
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Barsati And Another vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 April, 2019
Judges
  • Karuna Nand Bajpayee
Advocates
  • Dewarshi Kumar Rai