Court No. - 10
Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 474 of 2021 Petitioner :- Barsati Respondent :- Civil Judge And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Dharmendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner.
In view of the order proposed to be passed, notice need not be issued to the private-respondents.
The petitioner has preferred the present petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India with the prayer to issue a direction to the respondent No.1/Civil Judge (Junior Division) City, Jaunpur to decide the interim injunction application (6-C) filed in Original Suit No.517 of 2020 (Barsati Vs. Ram Nayak and Others) within stipulated period.
It is argued by learned counsel for the petitioner that apart from the aforesaid suit, an application 6-C has also preferred by him for grant of interim protection. It is argued that the interim protection is urgently required. It is argued that large number of dates were fixed in the matter but till date no final decision has been taken on the same.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and perused the record.
In the facts and circumstances of the case and without entering into merits of the case, the present petition, under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, is disposed of directing the respondent No.1/Civil Judge (Junior Division) City, Jaunpur to pass appropriate orders on the application 6-C filed by the petitioner on the next date fixed. In case, on the said date on account of any reason, the said application could not decide, the Civil Judge (Junior Division) City, Jaunpur will decide the same expeditiously and preferably within a period of one month thereafter.
Order Date :- 2.2.2021 Swati