IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 PRESENT THE HON’BLE MR.ABHAY S. OKA, CHIEF JUSTICE AND THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE H.T.NARENDRA PRASAD WRIT PETITION NOS.16796-16798 OF 2016(GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
1. BANK OF BARODA CORPORATE FINANCIAL BRANCH 1ST FLOOR, NITESH LEXINGTON AVENUE NO.72, BRIGADE ROAD BANGALORE-560 025. REPRESENTED BY ITS ASSISTANT GENERAL MANAGER MR. AMIT BHAUMIK 2. CORPORATION BANK CORPORATE BANKING BRANCH NO.30, “RALLARAM MEMORIAL BUILDING” MISSION ROAD BANGALORE-560 027 REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER MR. M.R. MANOHAR 3. DENA BANK “PEENYA INDUSTRIAL ESTATE BRANCH” VIVEK COMPLEX, S.M.ROAD JALAHALLI (WEST) BANGALORE-560 015.
REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF MANAGER MR.O.P.ARYA.
... PETITIONERS (BY SHRI.ARCHISHMAN CHOUDARY, ADV.
FOR SMT. NALINA MAYEGOWDA, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. GULBARGA AIRPORT DEVELOPERS PVT. LTD., HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.6-3-1186/5/A, III FLOOR AMOGH PLAZA, BEGUMPET HYDERABAD-500 016.
ADMINISTRATIVE OFFICE AT NO.42, II FLOOR, LEELAVATHI MANSION 6TH CROSS, MARGOSA ROAD MALLESHWARAM BANGALORE-560 003 REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR 2. REGIONAL AIRPORT HOLDINGS INTERNATIONAL LIMITED HAVING ITS REGISTERED OFFICE AT NO.2/11-B, BASEMENT JAGPURA ‘A’, NEW DELHI-110 014. REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR 3. STATE OF KARNATAKA REPRESENTED BY THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER GULBARGA DISTRICT GULBARGA-585101.
4. IL & FS TRUST COMPANY LIMITED IL & FS FINANCIAL CENTER A1 LATHEEF, 1ST FLOOR NO.2, UNION STREET OFF INFANTRY ROAD BANGALORE-560 001.
REPRESENTED BY ITS DIRECTOR ... RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI. VIKRAM HUILGOL, HCGP. FOR R3, R2 & R4 ARE SERVED) ---
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 28.10.2015 PASSED BY THE DEBTS RECOVERY APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI IN M.A.3/2015 AND M.A.4/2015 AT ANNEXURE-A AND ALLOW I.A.NO.2323/2014 AND DISMISS IA.4173/2014.
THESE PETITIONS COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, CHIEF JUSTICE MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER These writ petitions are directed against an order in appeals passed by the Debt Recovery Appellate Tribunal. The appeals were preferred against the order of Debt Recovery Tribunal vacating the interim order.
In view of the order dated 27th June 2016 passed by this Court, limited interim relief granted by this Court was also modified and the authorities were permitted to allot the contract to a selected bidder.
Therefore, with the passage of time, the writ petitions do not survive. Accordingly the writ petitions are disposed of.
We make it clear that we have not made adjudication on the merits of the original application pending before the Debt Recovery Tribunal.
Sd/- CHIEF JUSTICE Sd/- JUDGE DM