Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Bangalore Master’S Association vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|23 April, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF APRIL 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.15836 OF 2019 (GM-POLICE) BETWEEN:
BANGALORE MASTER’S ASSOCIATION NO.57, 3RD AND 4TH FLOOR JAYALAKSHMI CHAMBERS, RESIDENCY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560025, REPRESENTED BY ITS SECRETARY, MR. SUBASH NARAYANA SHETTY S/O NARAYANA SHETTY AGED ABOUT 53 YEARS.
… PETITIONER (BY SRI. NISHIT KUMAR SHETTY, ADVOCATE) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS SECRETARY HOME DEPARTMENT VIDHANA SOUDHA BENGALURU - 560 001.
2. THE COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BENGALURU CITY, NO.1, INFANTRY ROAD, BENGALURU - 560 001.
3. THE JOINT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE (CRIME) BENGALURU BENGALURU - 560 001.
4. THE JOINT COMMISSIOENR OF POLICE BENGALURU EAST DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 001.
5. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE BENGALURU CENTRAL DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 001.
6. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF POLICE THE CITY CRIME BRANCH (C.C.B) COTTON PETE MAIN ROAD, N.T. PET, BENGALURU - 560 001.
7. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER OF POLICE CUBBON PARK SUB DIVISION, BENGALURU - 560 001.
8. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE ASHOKNAGAR POLICE STATION, BENGALURU - 560 075.
9. THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE CENTRAL CRIME BRANCH (C.C.B) COTTON PETE MAIN ROAD, N.T PET, BENGALURU 560 053.
… RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. VIJAY KUMAR A. PATIL, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO DECLARE THAT THE PETITIONER IS NOT REQUIRED TO OBTAIN ANY PERMISSION OR LICENSE UNDER THE PROVISIONS OF LICENSING AND CONTROLLING OF PLACES OF THE PUBLIC AMUSEMENT ORDER TO PLAY INDOOR GAMES SUCH AS RUMMY[CARD GAME] CAROM, BILLIARDS/SNOOKER, DAISY GAME, LUDOO, DART GAME, CHESS, CAROM, SKILLED GAMES AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Sri. Nishit Kumar Shetty, learned counsel for the petitioner.
Sri. Vijay Kumar A. Patil, learned Additional Government Advocate for the respondents.
The petition is admitted for hearing. With the consent of learned counsel for the parties, it is heard finally.
2. In this petition, petitioner inter alia seeks seeks to declare that the petitioner is not required to obtain any permission or license under the provisions of Licensing and Controlling of Places of the Public Amusement Order to play indoor games such as Rummy (Card Game), Carrom, Billiards/Snooker, Daisy Game, Ludoo, Dart game, Chess, Skilled Games etc. and a writ of mandamus directing the respondents not to interfere with the recreational activities to be carried on by the members of the petitioner’s Association.
3. When the matter was taken up today, learned counsel for the parties submit that the impugned order in the writ petition is squarely covered by an order dated 22.02.2016 in W.P.No.101799/2016.
4. In view of the aforesaid submissions and with a view to maintain parity, writ petition is disposed of with the following conditions:
(i) The petitioner shall install CC TV cameras at the places of access to its members and also at all the places, wherein game(s) is / are played by the members within a period of six weeks. The CC TV footage of atleast prior 15 days’ period shall be made available by the petitioner to the jurisdictional police, as and when called upon to do so.
(ii) The petitioner shall issue identity card(s) to all its member(s), which shall be produced by the member(s), when called upon by the concerned police, during the raid(s), survelliance, etc.
(iii) The petitioner shall not allow any non-member(s) or the guest(s) of the member(s), to make use of its premises for the purpose of playing any kind of game(s) or recreational activities.
(iv) The petitioner shall not permit any activity by any of its member(s), by indulging in acts of amusement, falling within the definition of Ss.2(14) & 2(15) of the Act and shall not permit any game(s) of chance as per Explanation (II) of Sub-section (7) of Section 2 of Karnataka Police Act, 1963. The member(s) shall not be allowed to play any kind of game(s) with stakes or make any profit or gain out of the game(s) played.
(v) The petitioner shall put proper mechanism in place and shall ensure that no game(s) is played in any unlawful manner by the member(s). If the jurisdictional police find the game(s) played is/are contrary to any law and in violation of the settled practice, it is open to them to take action against the petitioner and the offenders, in accordance with law.
(vi) The jurisdictional police shall have liberty to visit premises periodically and/or on receipt of any information about any unlawful activity being carried on in the petitioner’s premises.
(vii) The respondents are directed not to interfere with the lawful recreational activities carried on by the members of the petitioner’s – Club/Association.
(viii) It is made clear that this order would not come in the way of the jurisdictional police invoking the provisions of the Act and taking action in accordance with law, if the member(s) of the petitioner is/are found to have indulged in any unlawful or immoral activities.
No order as to costs.
Sd/- JUDGE dn/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bangalore Master’S Association vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
23 April, 2019
Judges
  • Alok Aradhe