IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 27TH DAY OF APRIL, 2017 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH WRIT PETITION NO.18430 OF 2017(KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
BANGALORE GORAKSHANA SHALA DODDANEKUNDI, BENGALURU – 560 037 REPRESENTED BY SRI RAICHAND PRESIDENT, BGS …PETITIONER (BY SRI H.RAMACHANDRA, ADVOCATE FOR SRI H.R.ANANTHAKRISHNA MURTHY, ADVOCATE) AND :
THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER BENGALURU URBAN DISTRICT BENGALURU. …RESPONDENT (SMT. B.P.RADHA, HIGH COURT GOVERNMENT PLEADER) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO CONSIDER THE REPRESENTATION DATED 22.02.2017 UNDER ANNEXURE-D AT THE EARLIEST.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R The learned Government pleader takes notice for the respondent.
2. The petitioner seeks for a writ of mandamus to consider the representation dated 22.02.2017, vide Annexure ‘D’.
3. It is needless to state that some breathing time is required to be granted to the respondent to reply to such a request. To expect a writ of mandamus to consider the letter dated 22.02.2017, which is submitted very recently, would be wholly inappropriate.
4. Hence, the petition is dismissed as being premature with a liberty to the petitioner to file a fresh petition subsequently after a reasonable lapse of time.
The learned Government Pleader is permitted to file memo of appearance within four weeks.
Sd/- JUDGE sma