IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 29TH DAY OF JANUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD WRIT APPEAL NO.1373 OF 2016 (BDA) BETWEEN:
1. BANGALORE DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY T. CHOUDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020, REPRESENTED BY ITS COMMISSIONER.
2. THE DEPUTY SECRETARY-1 BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020.
3. THE ADDITIONAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER BENGALURU DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, T. CHOWDAIAH ROAD, KUMARA PARK WEST, BENGALURU-560 020 APPELLANTS 1 AND 3 ARE REPRESENTED BY THE S.L.A.O.
... APPELLANTS (BY SRI MURUGESH V. CHARATI, ADVOCATE) AND:
SRI R. V. BHASKAR AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, SON OF LATE RAJA VENKATACHALAPATHI, RESIDING AT NO.37, SURVEYOR STREET, BASAVANAGUDI, BENGALURU-560 004.
... RESPONDENT (BY SRI T. N. RAMESH, ADVOCTE) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SECTION 4 OF THE KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER PASSED IN THE WRIT PETITION NO.4587 OF 2014 (BDA) DATED 19.8.2015.
***** THIS WRIT APPEAL COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J., DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
JUDGMENT By the order dated 14-8-2018, the appellants’ counsel was directed to produce Resolution 102 of 2006 dated 4-7-2006. It is submitted that Draft Resolutions have been passed. When the appellants’ counsel was asked to point out the compliance of the said order, nothing is forthcoming from him. It is apparent that the said order has not been complied with. Under these circumstances, we find no ground to proceed further. The appeal is dismissed.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE rsk/-