Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Telangana
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Banddi Reddy Ganapathi vs The Govt Of A P

High Court Of Telangana|20 November, 2014
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY WRIT PETITION No.38726 of 2012 Dated:20.11.2014 Between:
Banddi Reddy Ganapathi, S/o Bhasava Raju and another.
….Petitioners And:
The Govt of A.P., reptd by its Principal Secretary, Agriculture and Co-Operation (Marketing.II) Department, Hyderabad and five others.
… Respondents Counsel for the petitioner: Sri Amancharla V.Gopala Rao Counsel for Respondent Nos.1, 3 to 6: A.G.P. for Agriculture (Andhra Pradesh) Counsel for Respondent No.2: Sri B.Narayana Reddy The court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed for the following substantive relief:
“to issue a writ, order or Direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS, by calling records, declaring the notices issued by the Respondent Nos.3 to 6 for vacating the Stalls in Rythu Bazar, Swaraj maidan, Vijayawada., vide Notice No. A1/281/2012, Dt. 08.11.2012, under the social welfare schemes for the physically handicapped persons for their livelihood, as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional, ultra-vires, in violation of principles of natural justice and contrary to the welfare schemes designed by the Respondent Nos.1 and 2 and consequently, declaring that G.O.Ms.No. 29, dated 16.02.2012 is not applicable to the petitioners.”
At the hearing, it is not disputed by learned counsel for both the parties that the issue similar to that raised in this Writ Petition, viz., extension of allotment period of stall in Rythu Bazaar beyond three years, was decided by this Court, vide Writ Petition No.33549 of 2014, dated 10.11.2014.
For the same reasons as contained in the aforesaid order, this Writ Petition is dismissed with the direction that the reasons contained therein shall form part of this order. However, this order will not preclude the Joint Collectors in the State to consider Letter No.RBZ/934/2013, dated 29.11.2013, of the Chief Executive Officer, Rythu Bazaars, Hyderabad and extend the term of the petitioners at his discretion. For a period of two weeks, the petitioners shall not be evicted from the respective stalls allotted to them to enable them to make representations to the competent authority.
As a sequel, interim orders, dated 14.12.2012 and 17.12.2012 are vacated and WPMP.No.49127 of 2012 is dismissed as infructuous.
C.V. NAGARJUNA REDDY, J
20th November, 2014 DR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Banddi Reddy Ganapathi vs The Govt Of A P

Court

High Court Of Telangana

JudgmentDate
20 November, 2014
Judges
  • C V Nagarjuna Reddy
Advocates
  • Sri Amancharla V Gopala Rao