Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Bansh Swaroop Tripathi vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 April, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 2670 of 2005 Petitioner :- Bansh Swaroop Tripathi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Others Counsel for Petitioner :- M.P. Gupta Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,K.N. Misra Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents. In the circumstances, I myself have perused the record.
2. By means of present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs :
"(i) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to pay the arrears of the salary and subsistence allowance to the petitioner along with 18 % interest as per Annexure no.2 and 3 within stipulated period.
(ii) Issue any suitable order or direction in the nature of writ which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper under the facts and circumstances of the case.
(iii) Award the cost of the writ petition."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or the petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 27.4.2018
Manish Himwan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Bansh Swaroop Tripathi vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 April, 2018
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • M P Gupta