Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2010
  6. /
  7. January

Balram Verma & Others vs State Of U.P., Thru. Prin. ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|29 June, 2010

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Vedpal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioners and the learned Additional Government Advocate.
Under challenge in the instant writ petition is FIR relating to Case Crime No. 168 of 2010, under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 and 427 IPC read with Sections 3(I) (X) SC/ST Act, police station Pasigawan, district Kheri. We have gone through the FIR, which discloses commission of cognizable offence, as such, the same cannot be quashed. The writ petition is misconceived and is accordingly dismissed. However, it is provided that if the petitioners surrender and move application for bail, the same shall be considered and disposed of by the courts below expeditiously.
Order Date :- 29.6.2010 Chauhan/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Balram Verma & Others vs State Of U.P., Thru. Prin. ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
29 June, 2010

Don’t wait for legal issues to escalate

By continuing past this page, you agree to our  Terms of Service,  Cookie Policy,  Privacy Policy,  Refund Policy   and Content Policies. © 2023 - Uber9 Business Process Services Private Limited. All rights reserved.