Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Balaraman [ vs Tahsildar Cuddalore Cuddalore Taluk Cuddalore District [

Madras High Court|05 September, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader takes notice for the respondent. By consent, the main writ petition is taken up for disposal at the admission stage itself.
2. The petitioner has filed the above writ petition to issue a writs of mandamus directing the respondent to dispose of the representation dated 10.07.2017 given by him.
3. The learned counsel appearing for the petitioner submitted that inspite of the petitioner's representation dated 10.07.2017, the respondent has not passed any order so far.
4. Mr.R.Rajeswaran, learned Special Government Pleader, appearing for the respondent submitted that the respondent may be directed to consider the petitioner's representation and pass orders in accordance with law, within eight weeks' time.
5. Having regard to the submissions made by the learned counsel on either side, without expressing any opinion with regard to the merits of the case, I direct the respondent to consider the petitioner's representation dated 10.07.2017 and pass orders in accordance with law, within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order, after giving notice to all the interested parties, including one Subramaniam, who is the paternal uncle of the petitioner.
With this observation, the writ petition is disposed of. No costs.
05.09.2017 rg To Tahsildar Cuddalore Cuddalore Taluk Cuddalore District M. DURAISWAMY,J.
rg W.P.No.21789 of 2017 05.09.2017
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Balaraman [ vs Tahsildar Cuddalore Cuddalore Taluk Cuddalore District [

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
05 September, 2017
Judges
  • M Duraiswamy