Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Balamurugan And Others vs The State Represented By Inspector Of Police

Madras High Court|08 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The petitioners, alleging that they have been falsely implicated by the respondent for the alleged offences punishable under Sections 294(b), 323, 324 and 506(ii) I.P.C. and Section 3(1)(s) of the Tamil Nadu SC/ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Amendment Act, 2015, seek a direction to the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Peramblur to consider the bail application that will be filed by them under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. on the same day of their surrender before him in connection with Cr.No. 622 of 2016 on the file of the respondent. 2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the petitioners as well as the learned Additional Public Prosecutor for the respondent.
3. Considering the nature of the prayer sought for and taking note of the fact that the petitioners are prepared to surrender before the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Perambalur, there shall be a direction to the learned Principal Sessions Judge, Perambalur, to consider the bail application to be submitted by the petitioners along with their surrender before that Court, on the same day on merits and pass appropriate orders.
4. The criminal original petition is ordered accordingly.
08.02.2017 rk Note: Issue order copy on 13.2.2017.
To
1. The Principal Sessions Judge, Perambalur.
2. The Inspector of Police, Kunnam Police Station, Perambalur District.
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Madras.
R.MAHADEVAN, J.
rk Crl.O.P.No.1972 of 2017 DATED: 08.02.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Balamurugan And Others vs The State Represented By Inspector Of Police

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
08 February, 2017
Judges
  • R Mahadevan