Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

Balamurali vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Secretary To Government And Others

Madras High Court|13 February, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 13.02.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S. NAGAMUTHU AND THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE N. SESHASAYEE W.P.No.10219 of 2004 Balamurali Petitioner Vs
1. The State of Tamil Nadu rep by Secretary to Government, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009
2. The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 008
3. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai – 600 008
4. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch (Team XII) Office of the Commissioner of Police, Chennai – 600 008
5. S.S. Krishna Murthy Deputy Commissioner of Police, Office of the Commissioner of Police, Chennai – 600 008
6. Navin Respondents Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying this Court to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the FIR in Cr.No.939 of 2003 dated 12.11.2003 on the file of the fourth respondent and quash the same.
For petitioner : Mr.V. Selvaraj For R.1 to R.4 : Mr.A.N. Thambidurai Spl.Govt. Pleader For R.5 : Mr.S. Rajendrakumar M/s.Norton & Grant For R.6 : Mr.S. Swaminathan M/s SPAN Associates ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S. NAGAMUTHU,J.,) The petitioner has filed the present writ petition to issue a Writ of Certiorari to call for the records relating to the FIR in Cr.No.939 of 2003 dated 12.11.2003 on the file of the fourth respondent and quash the same.
2. The petitioner is one of the accused in Cr.No.939 of 2003 on the file of Central Crime Branch, Chennai for the offences punishable under Secs.384 and 506 (ii) IPC. Seeking to quash the First Information Report, the petitioner has come up with this writ petition.
3. We have heard Mr.V. Selvaraj, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr.A.N. Thambidurai, learned Special Government Pleader for the respondents 1 to 4 and perused the records carefully.
4. It is submitted by the learned Special Government Pleader that in the instant case, on completing the investigation, further action was dropped and the said report was also accepted by the learned Magistrate.
5. Thus, nothing survives in this writ petition. Therefore, the writ petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs.
(S.N.J.,) (N.S.S.J.,) 13-02-2017 sr Index : Yes/no Internet : Yes/no S. NAGAMUTHU,J., AND N. SESHASAYEE,J., sr To
1. The Secretary to Government, Government of Tamil Nadu, Home Department, Fort St. George, Chennai – 600 009
2. The Director General of Police, Chennai – 600 008
3. The Commissioner of Police, Chennai – 600 008
4. The Inspector of Police, Central Crime Branch (Team XII) Office of the Commissioner of Police, Chennai – 600 008 W.P.No.10219 of 2004 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Balamurali vs The State Of Tamil Nadu Rep By Secretary To Government And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
13 February, 2017
Judges
  • S Nagamuthu
  • N Seshasayee