Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Baij Nath vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 July, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 49
Case :- APPLICATION U/S 482 No. - 25322 of 2018 Applicant :- Baij Nath Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- B.N.Singh,Santosh Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Pankaj Srivastava
Hon'ble Saumitra Dayal Singh,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
The present 482 Cr.P.C. application has been filed to quash the charge sheet dated 31.07.2017 as well as the entire proceedings of Case No. 6 of 2018 (State Vs. Baij Nath), arising out of Case Crime No. 286 of 2017, under Section- 138-B Electricity Act, Police Station- Kotwali Kalpi, District- Jalaun, pending in the court of Special Judge (E.C. Act).
It has been stated that the offence alleged is compoundable. The applicant is ready to settle the matter with the opposite party no. 2. Reliance has also been placed on a recent Supreme Court decision in the case of Suresh Ganpati Halvankar Vs. The State of Maharashtra & Ors. in Criminal Appeal No. 156 of 2018, decided on 22.01.2018.
Considering the above, the present application is disposed of with the following directions:
i) the applicant shall pay up the entire electricity dues as claimed, upto date, within a period of three weeks from today.
ii) upon payment of the electricity dues, the applicant shall, within a week therefrom file before the learned court below an application seeking compounding of the offence, as alleged.
iii) any amount that may have been deposited either towards electricity dues or compounding charges may be adjusted against the amount that may be claimed against the applicant.
iv) upon proof of payment of the electricity dues and the compounding charges, if any, the learned Court below shall decide the application for compounding filed by the applicant, in accordance with law before proceedings further, with the trial.
v) for a period of one month from today, and in the event of continued compliance being made by the applicant (of this order and also of the further directions that may be issued by the learned court below, within time as may be granted by it), coercive measures may not be adopted against the applicant till disposal of the compounding application.
vi) in the event of default on part of the applicant, the protection being granted by this order shall stand lifted and the applicant may be dealt with as if this order had not been passed.
With the aforesaid directions, the present application is disposed of. Order Date :- 27.7.2018 Abhilash
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Baij Nath vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 July, 2018
Judges
  • Saumitra Dayal Singh
Advocates
  • B N Singh Santosh Kumar Singh