The revision is directed against an order refusing to condone the delay of 245 days in preferring C.M.A against I.A.No.6 of 2013.
PUSHPA SATHYANARAYANA.J srn
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation for the petitioner. However, Mr.R.Muthukumar, learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that the suit itself was disposed of as early as on 28.01.2015. Hence, the prayer in the revision petition has become infructuous.
3. Accordingly, the Civil Revision Petition is dismissed as having become infructuous. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is closed.
31.01.2017 srn Index: yes/No Internet: yes To The Subordinate Court, Ponneri.
CRP PD No.1267 of 2014 and M.P.No.1 of 2014 http://www.judis.nic.in