IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT HYDERABAD FOR THE STATE OF TELANGANA AND THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH TUESDAY, THE EIGHTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND FOURTEEN Present HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.34842 of 2014 Between:
M/s. Bagio Automobiles, Rep. by its proprietor Sri C. Jagannadha Reddy, S/o. C. Narayana Reddy, Aged about 47 years, R/o. 19-3-270, Old Renigunta Road, Tirupathi, Chittoor District & another .. Petitioners AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Secretary, Revenue Department (Registration), Secretariat, Hyderabad & 3 others .. Respondents The Court made the following:
HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.34842 of 2014 ORDER:
The case of the petitioners is that the land to an extent of Ac. 26.00 cents which was covered by Survey No.74/7 of Akkarampalli belongs to Government land and the same was alienated to Tirupati Urban Development Authority. The Tirupati Urban Development Authority has handed over the said land to Andhra Pradesh Industrial Infrastructure Corporation Limited (for short ‘the APIIC’) for the purpose of establishment of Auto Nagar. The APIIC divided the land into plots. The petitioner purchased Plot Nos.95 and 94 respectively. As the petitioners intend to register the property in their name, they approached the Registrar, Balaji Registration Office, Chittoor District (4th respondent), who in turn, refused to receive the documents on the ground that the registration was stopped in respect of the land in Survey No.74 of Akkarampalli Village.
2. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the land concerning the very same survey number is the subject matter of issue before this Court in several writ petitions. In W.P.No.14439 of 2011, plots purchased by the petitioner therein situated in Survey No.74/7 agitated before this Court against the action of the respondent authorities in not processing the document for registration. This Court disposed of the said writ petition by order, dated 19.01.2012, and observed that the respondent authorities have no right to prevent the petitioner therein from enjoying his absolute rights and consequently directed respondents 1 to 4 that they shall not have any right to prevent any transaction by the petitioner vis-à-vis the plot allotted to it by the APIIC.
3. Following the same, this Writ Petition is disposed of holding that respondents 1 to 4 shall not have any right to prevent any transaction by the petitioners vis-à-vis the plots allotted to them by the APIIC. There shall be no order as to costs. Miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending in this writ petition, shall stand closed.
P.NAVEEN RAO, J Date: 18th November, 2014 KL HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE P.NAVEEN RAO WRIT PETITION No.34842 of 2014 Date: 18th November, 2014 KL