Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Badrol Rahman vs State Of Up

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|11 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 7
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 23918 of 2019 Applicant :- Badrol Rahman Opposite Party :- State Of Up Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Samiuzzaman Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Raj Beer Singh,J.
Supplementary affidavit filed today is taken on record.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the entire record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant in Case Crime No.268 of 2019, under Sections 384, 504, 506 I.P.C. P.S Rasoolpur, District Firozabad with the prayer to enlarge the applicant on bail.
The contention as raised at the bar by the learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case; that in the alleged incident the complainant or any other person has not sustained any injury; that no incriminating article or weapon has been recovered from the possession of the applicant or on his pointing out; that criminal history shown against the applicant has been explained in the supplementary affidavit; that in case the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in the trial and that he is in judicial custody since 6.5.2019.
Learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail.
Keeping in view the submission of learned counsel for the parties, period of detention of the applicant and all the attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, at this stage, prima facie, a case for bail has been made out.
Let the applicant Badrol Rahman involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-
(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence.
(ii) The applicant shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
(iii) The applicant shall appear on the date fixed by the trial Court
(iv) The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which applicant is accused, or suspected of the commission, of which applicant is suspected.
(v) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or temper with the evidence.
In case of default of any of the conditions enumerated above, it would be open to the prosecution to move for cancellation of bail.
Order Date :- 11.6.2019 Rk
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Badrol Rahman vs State Of Up

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
11 June, 2019
Judges
  • Raj Beer Singh
Advocates
  • Mohd Samiuzzaman Khan