1. Learned advocate for the contesting respondent Mr. M.D. Pandya has placed reliance on the following judgments to demonstrate that the petitioners are not entitled to any relief.
(i) (2004) 1 SCC 121 Union of India and others versus Jaipal Singh
(ii) (1997) 3 SCC 636 Krishnakant Raghunath Bibhavnekar versus State of Maharashtra and others.
AIR 1997 SC 1802 Ranchhodji Chaturji Thakore versus Superintendent Engineer, Gujarat Electricity Board, Himmatnagar (Gujarat) and another.
2. On the other hand, learned advocate for the petitioners Mr. A.J. Shastri submitted that he would like to rely on the following authorities :
(i) AIR 1991 SC 2010
(ii) 2000 (1) GLR 909 AIR 2007 SC 2645 List for further consideration on 23.01.2013.
(PARESH UPADHYAY, J.) MH Dave/2 & 125 Page 2 of 2