Babuben Widow Of Shantilal Jivraj ... vs (N) For Petitioner Nos.4 ­ 5

PRAVINCHANDRA LAHERCHAND SHAH AND OTHERS Versus BABUBEN WIDOW OF SHANTILAL JIVRAJ BHANSALI AND ANOTHER ====================================== Appearance :

MR VIPUL S MODI for Petitioner Nos.1 ­ 3,6 ­ 9, 11,UNSERVED­EXPIRED (N) for Petitioner Nos.4 ­ 5, 12,­ for Petitioner No.10, None for Respondent Nos.1,1.2.1 MR PRAKASH K JANI for Respondent Nos.1.2.2, 1.2.3, 1.2.4, 1.2.5,1.2.6 RULE SERVED for Respondent No.2.

====================================== CORAM : HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE D.H.WAGHELA Date : 30/07/2012 ORAL ORDER Learned counsel, Mr.Girish K. Patel submitted that learned advocate on record Mr.Vipul S. Modi is unable to proceed with the matter today, and therefore, adjournment of hearing for only one day may be granted. He also stated that in case learned counsel, Mr.Modi is not available tomorrow, for any reason, he will argue the petition for the petitioners in view of earlier orders and pendency of the petition since about 20 years. Hence, S.O. to 31st July 2012.

(D.H.Waghela, J.) *malek HC-NIC Page 1 of 1 Created On Tue Jul 12 02:41:25 IST 2016