Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Babloo vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|10 June, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 1
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 15960 of 2019 Petitioner :- Babloo Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Urmila Shukla,Akhilesh Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Ramesh Sinha,J. Hon'ble Vivek Varma,J.
Heard Sri Akhilesh Kumar, learned counsel for the petitioner, Sri A.K.Saxena, learned counsel for respondent no.3, Sri G.P.Singh, learned AGA for the State.
Sri A.K.Saxena,learned counsel for the respondent no.3 has pointed out that investigation has been concluded and charge sheet has been submitted in the present case, hence the present petition has become infructuous.
In view of the statement made by Sri A.K.Saxena, learned counsel for respondnet no.3 at Bar, the present petition is dismissed as having become infructuous.
(Vivek Varma, J.) (Ramesh Sinha, J.) Order Date :- 10.6.2019/NS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Babloo vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
10 June, 2019
Judges
  • Ramesh Sinha
Advocates
  • Urmila Shukla Akhilesh Kumar