Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

B Wilson [ vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Police And Others

Madras High Court|12 January, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

This writ petition has been filed for issuance of a Writ of Mandamus directing the first and second respondents to register a criminal complaint against the third respondent and to recover a sum of Rs.10,61,000/- with interest at 24% p.a. from the third respondent to be paid to the petitioner.
2. It is stated in the affidavit filed in support of this writ petition that the petitioner had given a sum of Rs.30,00,000/- to the third respondent, on a promise made by the third respondent to secure a medical seat in Meenakshi Medical College, for the petitioner's daughter. Thereafter, the third respondent had failed to secure the seat to the petitioner's daughter and also not returned the money. In this regard, a complaint made by the petitioner against the third respondent, was refused to be investigated by the second respondent police. Thereafter, the petitioner had also approached the first respondent to initiate proper legal action against the third respondent. Since no action was forthcoming, the present writ petition has been filed with the prayer as already stated supra.
3. Today, when this writ petition was taken up, the learned counsel for the petitioner submitted that the complaint filed by him before the second respondent police came to be closed without calling the petitioner for enquiry.
4. In reply to the above submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner, the learned Additional Public Prosecutor appearing for the respondents 1 and 2 fairly submitted that the respondent police is inclined to afford an opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. Further, he submitted that the respondents 1 and 2 may be directed to provide opportunity of hearing to the petitioner and commence the enquiry afresh and complete the same within a stipulated period.
5. The above statement made by the learned Additional Public Prosecutor is recorded, and the first respondent is directed to complete the enquiry on the complaint given by the petitioner afresh, after affording proper opportunity to the petitioner to put forth his case, and pass appropriate orders within a period of eight weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order.
6. The writ petition is disposed of accordingly. No costs.
Index : Yes/No 12.01.2017 Internet : Yes/No KM R.MAHADEVAN, J.
KM To
1. The Assistant Commissioner of Police, Tambaram Circle, Chennai-600 045.
2. The Inspector of Police, S-11, Tambaram Police Station, Tambaram, Chennai-600 045.
3. The Public Prosecutor, Madras High Court, Chennai-600 104.
W.P.No.43336 of 2016 12.01.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

B Wilson [ vs The Assistant Commissioner Of Police And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
12 January, 2017
Judges
  • R Mahadevan