IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 28th DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NO.51115 OF 2016 C/W WRIT PETITON NO.51114 OF 2016 (GM-RES) WRIT PETITION NO.51115 OF 2016 BETWEEN:
SMT B V ESHWARAMMA AGED ABOUT 58 YEARS W/O ANANDAIAH K.S R/AT H GOLLAHALLI VILLAGE, DUGGASANDRA HOBLI, MULBAGAL TALUK, KOLAR DISTRICT-563 127.
(By Mr. HEMANTH KUMAR D, ADV.) AND:
… PETITIONER 1. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED OFFICE OF DMS CORPORATION, BANGALORE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION, K.R.CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BANGALORE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION, K.R.CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001.
3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE) C.O. AND M DIVISION, CHAMPION REEFS, KGF-563 117. … RESPONDENTS (By Mr. P. PRASANNA KUMAR, ADV. FOR R1 & R2 (ABSENT) R3 SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED) This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned endorsement dated 22.3.2016 vide Annx-C issued by the R-3. Direct the respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner in accordance with Annx-A dated 23.12.2015 and Annx-D dated 15.3.2016 and direct to give the petitioner a time period of one year for the completion of the installation of SRTPV unit and etc.
WRIT PETITION NO.51114 OF 2016 BETWEEN:
SMT MAHALAKSHMAMMA AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, W/O SHANKARANARAYAN, R/AT MARAKALAGHATTA VILLAGE, MULBAGAL TALUK KOLAR DISTRICT-563127. … PETITIONER (By Mr. HEMANTH KUMAR D, ADV.) AND:
1. BANGALORE ELECTRICITY SUPPLY COMPANY LIMITED OFFICE OF DMS CORPORATION, BANGALORE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION, K.R.CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001 REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
2. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR BANGALORE ELECTRICITY CORPORATION, K.R.CIRCLE, BANGALORE-560 001.
3. EXECUTIVE ENGINEER (ELE) C.O AND M.DIVISION, CHAMPION REEFS KGF-563117.
… RESPONDENTS (By Mr. H.M. MANJUNATH, ADV. FOR R1 TO 3 (ABSENT) Mr. DEVARAJU H.V. ADV., FOR R3) - - -
This Writ Petition is filed under Articles 226 & 227 of the Constitution of India, praying to quash the impugned endorsement dated 22.3.2016 vide Annex-C issued by R3. Direct respondents to consider the claim of the petitioner in accordance with annexure-A dated 23.12.2015 and Annex-D dated 15.3..2016 and direct to give the petitioner a time period of one year for the completion of the installation of SRTPV unit and etc.
These Writ Petitions coming on for preliminary hearing in ‘B’ group this day, the Court made the following:-
ORDER Sri.Hemanth Kumar D., learned counsel for the petitioners.
None for the respondents.
2. In view of the subsequent event which has been taken place during the pendency of the writ petitions namely the cancellation of the contract of the petitioners, learned counsel for the petitioners seeks leave of this Court to withdraw the writ petitions with liberty to take recourse to such remedy as may be available to them under the law.
Accordingly, the petitions are dismissed as withdrawn with the aforesaid liberty.
Sd/- JUDGE RV