IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 8TH DAY OF JULY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA W.P.NOs.19945/2019 AND 27682/2019(KLR-CON) BETWEEN SMT. B.SAROJA W/O K.RAJARAM, AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS, R/AT KANIYANAHUNDI VILLAGE, HAMPAPURA HOBLI, G.B.SARAGUR POST, H.D.KOTE TALUK, MYSORE DISTRICT – 571 114.
(BY SRI. RAMESH ANANTHAN, ADVOCATE) …PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF SECRETARY, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560 001.
2. THE PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, GOVERNMENT OF KARNATAKA, VIDHANA SOUDHA, BANGALORE – 560 001.
3. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, DISTRICT COMMISSIONER OFFICE, KRISHNARAJA BOULWARD ROAD, CHAMARAJAPURAM, MYSORE DISTRICT, MYSORE – 570 005.
4. THE TAHASILDAR, TALUK OFFICE, MINI VIDHANA SOUDHA, H.D.KOTE TALUK, H.D.KOTE, MYSORE DISTRICT – 571 114. (BY SRI.T.S. MAHANTESH, AGA) …RESPONDENTS THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE FINAL NOTICE DATED 18.02.2019 MARKED AS ANNEXURE – J, AS NOT MAINTAINABLE IN LAW OR FACTS AND ETC., THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER The learned counsel for the petitioner files a memo stating that the petition has become infructuous.
The memo is taken on record.
The writ petitions are dismissed as having become infructuous.
Sd/- JUDGE TL