In The High Court Of Karnataka At Bengaluru Between:
DATED THIS THE 14TH DAY OF OCTOBER 2019 BEFORE The Hon’ble Mr.Justice B.M.Shyam Prasad Regular Second Appeal No. 1204 of 2018 1. RAMALINGAIAH AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, SON OF HANUMANTHAIAH.
2 . SIDDARAMAIAH AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, SON OF HANUMANTHAIAH.
BOTH ARE RESIDENTS OF BHATTARAHALLI, HULIYAR HOBLI, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK, TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
(BY SMT. S. B. LAKSHMI., ADVOCATE) And:
1. B. S. MOHAN @ B. S. MOHAN KUMAR AGED ABOUT 59 YEARS, SON OF SATHYANARAYANA RAO, NEAR ABC BRICK FACTORY THIMPLAPURA ROAD, HULIYAR TOWN, CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI, TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
2. SRI. SHANKARIAH SON OF LATE NINGAPPA ... APPELLANTS AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS R/AT BHATTARAHALLI VILLAGE HULIYAR HOBLI CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI TALUK TUMAKURU DISTRICT.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI. D R RAVISHANKAR , ADVOCATE FOR C/R-1 NOTICE NOT ORDER IN RESPECT OF R-2) THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL IS FILED UNDER SEC.100 OF CPC., READ WITH ORDER XLII OF CPC., AGAINST THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 19.04.2018 PASSED IN R.A. NO. 27/17 ON THE FILE OF THE SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHIKKANAYAKANAHLLI, DISMISSING THE APPEAL AND CONFIRMING THE JUDGEMENT AND DECREE DATED 27.04.2017 PASSED IN OS.NO. 29/2004 ON THE FILE OF THE ADDITIONAL CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC., CHIKKANAYAKANAHALLI.
THIS REGULAR SECOND APPEAL COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT DELIVERED THE FOLLOWING:
Judgment The learned counsel for the appellants files a memo stating that the appellants be permitted to withdraw the appeal because of a settlement with the respondent No.2.
The memo is accepted. The appeal is dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the dismissal of the appeal, I.A.Nos.2/2018 and 1/2019 does not survive for consideration, and the same is accordingly disposed of.
Sd/- Judge KPS