Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. Madras High Court
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

B Ramanujam vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Others

Madras High Court|14 March, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED 14.03.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE S.NAGAMUTHU and THE HONOURABLE DR.JUSTICE ANITA SUMANTH H.C.P No.389 of 2017 B.Ramanujam Vs
1. State of Tamil Nadu, Rep.by the Secretary of State, .. Petitioner Prohibition and Excise Department, St.George Fort, Chennai – 600 009.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Poonamallee High Road, Vepery, Chennai-600 007 .. Respondents Habeas Corpus Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India to issue a writ of Habeas Corpus of any other writ of direction calling upon the production of the records relating to the detention order dated 06.08.2016 made in detention Order Memo No.849/BCDFGISSSV/2016 passed by the second respondent herein and quash the same and direct the respondents to produce the body or person of the petitioner's husband Senthilkumar @ Kulla Kenda,S/o Gopal, aged 31 years branded as Goonda an now confined in Central Prison, Puzhal, Chennai before this Court and set him at liberty forthwith.
For Petitioner : Mr.C. Mohan Raj For respondents : Mr.V.M.R. Rajentren Addl. Public Prosecutor ORDER (Order of the Court was made by S. NAGAMUTHU,J.,) The petitioner, who is the wife of the detenu Senthilkumar @ Kulla Kenda S/o Mr.Gopal aged 31 years, has come forward with this petition challenging the detention order passed by the second respondent dated 06.08.2016 against her husband branding him as a "Goonda" under the Tamil Nadu Prevention of Dangerous Activities of Bootleggers, Drug Offenders, Forest Offenders, Goondas, Immoral Traffic Offenders, Sand Offenders, Slum Grabbers and Video Pirates Act, 1982 [Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982].
2. The learned Additional Public Prosecutor would submit that the order of detention passed by the second respondent as against her husband dated 06.08.2016 has been revoked by the Government in G.O. [Rt] No.4627 Home, Prohibition & Excise [XIII] Department dated 28.09.2016 and he has also produced a copy of the said order.
3. Recording the submission of the learned Additional Public Prosecutor, this petition is closed as the same has become infructuous.
Index : Yes/no Internet : Yes/no sr (S.N.J.,) (A.S.M.J.,) 14-03-2017 To
1. The Secretary, Home, State of Tamil Nadu, Home Prohibition and Excise Department, Fort St.Feorge, Chennai – 600 009.
2. The Commissioner of Police, Poonamallee High Road, Vepery, Chennai-600 007
3. The Public Prosecutor, High Court, Chennai.
S.NAGAMUTHU,J.
And
ANITA SUMANTH,J.,
sr Order in H.C.P.No.1911 of 2016 14.03.2017 http://www.judis.nic.in
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

B Ramanujam vs State Of Tamil Nadu And Others

Court

Madras High Court

JudgmentDate
14 March, 2017
Judges
  • S Nagamuthu
  • Anita Sumanth