Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

B Nagarathnamma W/O Late Krishna Reddy vs State Of Karnataka

High Court Of Karnataka|09 December, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE:
THE HON’BLE MRS. JUSTICE S.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION No.19218/2013 (LA – KIADB) BETWEEN:
1 . B.NAGARATHNAMMA W/O LATE KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS 2 . K.N.VENUGOPAL REDDY S/O NARAYANA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS BOTH ARE R/AT KADU BEESANAHALLI, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT ... PETITIONERS [BY SRI VIKRAM SIMHA, ADV.] AND:
1 . STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS ADDL. CHIEF SECRETARY & PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE & INDUSTRIES, M.S. BUILDING, BENGALURU-560001.
2 . KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560002.
REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR.
3 . SPECIAL LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER KARNATAKA INDUSTRIAL AREAS DEVELOPMENT BOARD NRUPATHUNGA ROAD, BENGALURU-560002.
4 . KARNATAKA UDYOGA MITRA & STATE LEVEL SINGLE WINDOW CLAERANCE COMMITTEE, KHANIJA BHAVAN, DEVARAJ URS ROAD, BENGALURU-560001 REP BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR AND MEMBER SECRETARY. …RESPONDENTS [BY SRI NITYANANDA K.R., HCGP FOR R-1; SRI P.V.CHANDRASHEKAR, ADV. FOR R-2 & R-3;
SRI C.M.POONACHA, ADV. FOR R-4.] THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO QUASH THE IMPUGNED NOTIFICATION DATED 09.02.2004 VIDE ANNEXURE- D ISSUED BY THE FRIST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 28(1) OF THE KIADB ACT, AND C1-126 SPQ 2005(P) DATED 19.12.2005 VIDE ANNEXURE-E ISSUED BY THE FIRST RESPONDENT UNDER SECTION 28(4) OF THE KIADB ACT WITH RESPECT TO PETITIONER’S No.1 & 2 LANDS IN SY.NO.146/1 MEASURING 25 ½ GUNTAS AND 25 ½ GUNTAS RESPECTIVELY SITUATED AT AMMANI BELLANDUR KHANE, VARTHUR HOBLI, BENGALURU EAST TALUK, BENGALURU DISTRICT.
THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
O R D E R Learned counsel for the petitioners has filed a memo seeking leave of the Court to withdraw the writ petition.
Memo is placed on record. Permission is granted. The writ petition stands dismissed as withdrawn.
In view of the dismissal of the writ petition, pending I.A. does not survive for consideration and the same stands disposed of.
Sd/- JUDGE PMR
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

B Nagarathnamma W/O Late Krishna Reddy vs State Of Karnataka

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
09 December, 2019
Judges
  • S Sujatha