IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU ON THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY, 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE RAVI MALIMATH AND THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD WRIT PETITION NO.22824 OF 2018 (GM-DRT) BETWEEN:
B. N. VEERABHADRAIAH SON OF LATE NAGAIAH, AGED ABOUT 86 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.471, 55TH CROSS, III BLOCK, RAJAJINAGAR, BENGALURU – 560 010.
... PETITIONER (BY SRI SHASHIKIRAN SHETTY, SENIOR ADVOCATE FOR M/S. SHETTY AND HEGDE ASSOCIATES) AND:
1. PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK CIRCLE OFFICE, RECOVERY DEPARTMENT, NO.26-27, RAHEJA TOWERS, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU-560 001.
2. CHIEF MANAGER PUNJAB NATIONAL BANK CIRCLE OFFICE, RECOVERY DEPARTMENT, 26-27, RAHEJA TOWERS, M.G. ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 001.
3. M/S. SEVEN WONDER BOARDING AND LODGING REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, N. P. VISHWANATH, ADDRESS: NOT KNOWN.
4. M/S. SANJEEVINI PACKAGED DRINKING WATER REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, B R BYRA REDDY, ADDRESS: NOT KNOWN.
5. M/S. MARUTHI TABLE BRICKS REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, MRS. SUNITHA, ADDRESS: NOT KNOWN.
6. M/S. MARUTHI GARDEN RESTAURANT REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SHIVAMMA, WIFE OF LATE SIDDAMARAIAH, ADDRESS: NOT KNOWN.
7. M/S. MARUTHI CONCRETE BLOCKS REPRESENTED BY ITS PROPRIETOR, SRI NARAYANAPPA, ADDRESS: NOT KNOWN.
8. SRI L. SIDDAMARAIAH SON OF LAKSHMI NARAYANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 52 YEARS, RESIDING AT NO.196/1, MARUTHINILAYA, 4TH CROSS, A.G. SRIRANGANAGAR, DODDRANGAPPA ROAD, BENGALURU – 560 085.
9. SMT. JAYALAKSHMI WIFE OF LATE N. M. NARAYANA.
10. SMT. KALPANA WIFE OF RAJU.
11. SRI PRAVEEN REDDY SON OF N. M. NARAYANA REDDY.
12. SMT. BABITHA WIFE OF SATHISH REDDY, DAUGHTER OF N. M. NARAYANA REDDY.
RESPONDENT NOS.9 TO 12 ARE RESIDING AT SRILAXMINIVAS, 1ST MAIN ROAD, DODDANEKUNDI, BENGALURU – 560 037.
... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI BHARATH K., ADVOCATE FOR R-1;
SRI BALARAM M. L., ADVOCATE FOR R-3 TO R-8; SRI K. G. NAYAK, ADVOCATE FOR R-9 TO R-12; R-2 SERVED) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE JUDGMENT DATED 03.10.2017 PASSED BY THE DEBT RECOVERY AT BENGALURU IN T.S.A.NO.4 OF 2017 IN S.A.NO.478 OF 2014 BEING ARBITRARY, ILLEGAL AND WITHOUT ANY JURISDICTION (ANNEXURE-A) ETC.
***** THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, RAVI MALIMATH, J., PASSED THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER A memo for disposal of writ petition has been filed by the learned counsel for the petitioner dated 20th February, 2019, indicating that in view of the settlement arrived at in terms of the absolute sale deed dated 7-2-2019 and the “No Objection Certificate” the petition may be disposed off.
2. A memo is also filed by the learned counsel for respondent No.1, signed by respondent No.1 indicating the settlement arrived at between the parties.
In view of the memo, the petition is disposed off in terms of the settlement arrived at.
Sd/- Sd/-
JUDGE JUDGE rsk/-