IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.9543/2018(KLR-REG) BETWEEN B.MADAIAH SON OF LATE HULLURE GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 76 YEARS, RESIDING AT BOMMANAYAKANAHALLI, MALUR HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI H P MUDLAPPA, ADVOCATE) AND 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY TO GOVT.
M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE 560001.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DIST, MANDYA 571401.
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANDYA SUB-DIVSIION MANDYA 571401.
4. THE THASILDAR MADDUR TALUK, MADDUR 571428 MANDYA DIST.
5. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR OF KESTHRU VILLAGE, OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR MADDUR -571428 MANDYA DIST.
6. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT OF KESTHRU VILLAGE, OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR MADDUR 571428 MANDYA DIST.
7. THE TALUK SURVEYOUR OF KESTHUR VILLAGE, OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR MADDUR 571428, MANDYA DIST.
8. SRI D.C. THAMMANNA MLA CHAIRMAN, LAND GRANT COMMITEE OF REGULARISATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND, NO.2421, 1ST MAIN ROAD, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE 560 040. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VENKATESH DODERI, AGA R8 IS DELETED V/O DT.31.8.2018) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS PERTAINING TO SY NO.108 LAND MEASURING 1 ACRE 18 GUNTAS OF KESTUR VILAGE, AUTHAGUR HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK FROM THE THASILDAR 4TH RESPONDENT MADDUR TALUK, MADDUR, MANDYA DISTRICT FORTHWITH AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Petitioner herein is seeking mandamus to respondents to consider his applications in Form No.53 for regularization or for grant of land measuring 1 acre 18 guntas in Sy.No.108 of Kesthur Village, Athagur Hobli, Maddur Taluk, Mandya District. Two of such applications which are produced by the petitioner are dated 31.12.1989 vide Annexure-A and reminder dated 31.12.2003 vide Annexure-A1.
2. However, when the said applications produced in this proceedings are looked in to, it is seen that there is no reference to the date of filing of said applications before the competent authority instead, they are the typed copies with the signature of learned counsel for the petitioner, which cannot be considered.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed.
Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within two weeks.
nd/-
Sd/- JUDGE