Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2017
  6. /
  7. January

B Kenchappa Gowda vs A Prasad And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|05 December, 2017
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 5TH DAY OF DECEMBER 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE K.N.PHANEENDRA Crl.P. No.3960 OF 2013 BETWEEN:
B.KENCHAPPA GOWDA, S/O LATE BYRAPPA, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/AT NO.1/2, MOUNTAIN ROAD, I BLOCK, JAYANAGAR, BANGALORE-560011.
(BY SRI. K.DIWAKARA-ADVOCATE) AND:
1. A.PRASAD S/O LATE ANJANAPPA, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, …..PETITIONER “DIRECTOR”, VOKKALIGARA SANGHA, R/AT 389, I FLOOR, 13TH CROSS, OPPOSITE STATE BANK OF INDIA, SADASHIVANAGARA, BANGALORE-560080.
2. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, BY THE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, C.C.B. F&M, BANGALORE-560016.
...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI.B.VIJAY SHETTY, ADVOCATE FOR R1 BY SRI.S.RACHAIAH, HCGP FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 482 AND 483 OF CR.P.C., TO QUASH THE ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS IN C.C.NO.23215/2012 IN THE COURT OF THE I ADDL.C.M.M., BANGALORE, IN SO FAR AS HE IS CONCERNED.
THIS CRIMINAL PETITION COMING ON FOR ‘ORDER’ THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
O R D E R Learned counsel appearing for the petitioner files a memo seeking permission to withdraw the petition with a direction to expedite the trial.
2. There is no abnormal prayer as sought for. Hence, memo is recorded.
3. The learned counsel is permitted to withdraw the petition.
4. Trial Court is hereby directed to expedite the trial and dispose it of as expeditiously as possible.
Sd/-
JUDGE JS
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

B Kenchappa Gowda vs A Prasad And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
05 December, 2017
Judges
  • K N Phaneendra