IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 25TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.9547/2018 (KLR-LG) BETWEEN B K NAGARAJU S/O NANJUNDIAH @ KARI GOWDA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS, RESIDING AT BOMMANAYAKANAHALLI POST, MALURU HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK RAMANAGARA DISTRICT ... PETITIONER (BY SRI MUDLAPPA H P, ADVOCATE) AND 1 THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY TO GOVT.
M.S. BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560001.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER MANDYA DISTRICT, MANDYA -571401.
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER MANDYA SUB-DIVSIION MANDYA - 571401.
4. THE THASILDAR MADDUR TALUK, MADDUR 571428 MANDYA DISTRICT.
5. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR OF KESTHUR VILLAGE, OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR MADDUR- 571428 MANDYA DISTRICT.
6. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT OF KESTHR VILLAGE, OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR MADDUR 571428 MANDYA DISTRICT.
7. THE TALUK SURVEYOUR OF KESTHUR VILLAGE, OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR MADDUR- 571428, MANDYA DISTRICT.
8. SHRI D.C.THAMANNA, MLA CHAIRMAN, LAND GRANT COMMITEE OF REGULARISATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND, NO.2421, 1ST MAIN ROAD, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE 560 040. ...RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VENKATESH DODDERI, AGA) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS PERTAINING TO SY NO.108/93 LAND MEASURING 1 ACRE 30 GUNTAS OF KESTHUR VILLAGE, AUTHAGUR HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK FROM THE THASILDAR- 4TH RESPONDENT, MADUR TALUK, MADDUR, MANDYA DISTRICT FORTHWITH AND ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Petitioner herein is seeking mandamus to respondents to consider his applications in Form No.53 for regularization or for grant of land measuring 1 acre 30 guntas in Sy.no.108/93 of Kesthur Village, Athagur Hobli, Maddur Taluk, Mandya District. Two of such applications which are produced by the petitioner is dated 12.4.1999 vide Annexure-A and the reminder is dated 31.12.2003 vide Annexure-A1.
However, when the said applications produced in this proceedings are looked in to, it is seen that there is no reference to the date of filing of said applications before the competent authority instead, they are the typed copies with the signature of learned counsel for the petitioner, which cannot be considered.
Accordingly, this writ petition is dismissed.
Learned Additional Government Advocate is permitted to file memo of appearance within two weeks from today.
Sd/- JUDGE nd/-