IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF DECEMBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE B. M. SHYAM PRASAD REGULAR SECOND APPEAL NO.517 OF 2018 (DEC/INJ) Between:
B.H.Rangaiah, Since dead by his LRs., 1. Ranganatha B.R., S/o late Rangaiah B.H., Aged about 58 years, R/o D.No.1186, Basatti Koppalu, K.R.Puram, Hassan – 573 201.
2. Dharma, S/o late B.H.Rangaiah, Aged about 46 years, Occ: Agriculture, R/o Basetti Koppalu, Hassan City.
3. Jayamma, D/o B.H.Rangaiah, W/o Rangegowda K.M., Aged about 63 years, R/o D.No.58, S.B.M.Colony, Arasikere Road, K.Katihalli, Hassan – 573 201.
4. Shantha, D/o B.H.Rangaiah, W/o Sannegowda, Aged about 60 years, R/o D.No.EW 13-387, Sri.Srinivasa Nilaya, 4th Main Road, Bagderakoppalu, Hassan – 573 201.
5. Bhanu, D/o B.H.Rangaiah, W/o Sathish, Aged about 52 years, R/o D.No.987, Bahubali Nilaya, 10th Cross, K.R.Puram, Hassan – 573 201.
6. Yoga, D/o B.H.Rangaiah, W/o late Annegowda (Annappa), Aged about 56 years, R/o D.No.1187, Basatti Koppalu, K.R.Puram, Hassan – 573 201.
7. Kumari, D/o B.H.Rangaiah, W/o late Srinivasa, Aged about 54 years, R/o D.No.987, Bahubali Nilaya, 10th Cross, K.R.Puram, Hassan – 573 201.
(By Sri.M.V.Hiremath, Advocate (Absent)) ...Appellants And:
Rangamma, W/o Narasegowda, Since dead by her LRs.
1. B.N.Nagaraj, S/o B.S.Narasegowda, Aged about 58 years, 2. B.N.Srinivasa, S/o B.S.Narasegowda, Aged about 52 years, 3. B.N.Suresh, S/o B.S.Narasegowda, Aged about 50 years, 4. B.N.Jayashankar, S/o B.S.Narasegowda, Age: Major, 5. Lalitha, W/o D.Manjunath, Aged about 54 years, All are residing at Rakshanapuram, 2nd Cross, Hassan – 573 201.
Ramakka, Since dead by LRs., 6. H.V.Umesha, S/o Ramakka, Aged about 42 years, 7. H.V.Prakash, S/o Ramakka, Aged about 40 years, 8. H.V.Premanatha, S/o Ramakka, Aged about 35 years, 9. H.V.Veena, D/o Ramakka, Aged about 23 years, 10. H.M.Venkatappa, H/o Ramakka, Aged about 73 years, All are residing in Door No.2898, Telugara Beedi, Hassan – 573 201.
…Respondents This RSA is filed under Section 100 of CPC., against the Judgment and Decree dated 07.07.2017 passed in R.A.No.151/2013 on the file of the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Hassan, dismissing the appeal and confirming the Judgment and Decree dated 20.03.2008 passed in O.S.No.575/1992 on the file of the Principal Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) and JMFC, Hassan.
This RSA coming on for Orders, this day, the Court delivered the following:-
JUDGMENT None appears for the appellants. This Court on 23.09.2019 had adjourned the appeal granting three weeks time for compliance with the office objections subject to the condition that the appeal would be listed for dismissal if there is failure to comply with the office objections. Despite this peremptory order, the office objections have not been complied with. It is obvious that the concerned is not interested in prosecuting the appeal. Therefore, the appeal is dismissed for default.
SD/- JUDGE Mds/-