Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

B G Gopal vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR.JUSTICE S.N.SATYANARAYANA WRIT PETITION NO.9548/2018 (KLR-RES) BETWEEN:
B.G.GOPAL S/O LATE B.L.GURU SIDDAPPA, AGED ABOUT 49 YEARS RESIDING AT: BOMMANAYAKANAHALLI POST, MALURU HOBLI, CHANNAPATNA TALUK, RAMNAGARA DIST. ... PETITIONER (BY SRI H P MUDLAPPA, ADV.) AND:
1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY ITS REVENUE SECRETARY TO GOVT., M.S.BUILDINGS, BANGALORE-560001.
2. THE DEPUTY COMMISSIONER, MANDYA DIST., MANDYA – 571 401.
3. THE ASSISTANT COMMISSIONER, MANDYA SUB-DIVISION, MANDYA-571401.
4. THE THASILDAR, MADDUR TALUK, MADDUR – 571428, MANDYA DISTRICT.
5. THE REVENUE INSPECTOR OF KESTHUR VILLAGE, OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR, MADDUR-571428, MANDYA DISTRICT.
6. THE VILLAGE ACCOUNTANT OF KESTHUR VILLAGE, OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR, MADDUR – 571428, MANDYA DISTRICT.
7. THE TALUK SURVEYOUR OF KESTHUR VILLAGE, OFFICE OF THE THASILDAR, MADDUR – 571428, MANDYA DISTRICT.
8. SHRI D C THAMANNA, MLA, CHAIRMAN, LAND GRANT COMMITTEE OF REGULARISATION OF UNAUTHORIZED OCCUPATION OF AGRICULTURAL LAND, NO.2421, 1ST MAIN ROAD, VIJAYANAGARA 2ND STAGE, BANGALORE-560040. ... RESPONDENTS (BY SRI VENKATESH DODDERI, AGA FOR R-1 TO R-8) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO CALL FOR RECORDS PERTAINING TO SY NO.107/93 LAND MEASURING 2 ACRES OF KESTHUR VILLAGE, AUTHAGUR HOBLI, MADDUR TALUK FROM THE THASILDAR R-4 MADDUR TALUK, MADDUR, MANDYA DISTRICT ETC.
THIS WRIT PETITION COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING ‘B’ GROUP THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER Petitioner herein is seeking a direction to the authorities concerned to consider his application filed in Form No.53 for grant of 2 Acres of land in Sy.No.107/93 of Kesthur village, Athagur Hobli, Maddur taluk, Mandya district. It is stated that the petitioner is in cultivation of the said land for the past 60 years.
However, his age is only 30 years as on the date of filing of the application. The acknowledgment for having filed the application is not produced on record and only the printed copy of Form No.53 said to have been filed before the authorities is filed. The same cannot be accepted.
2. In any event, this Court is not inclined to consider his prayer, in as much as there is no document to demonstrate that application is filed by the petitioner seeking grant in Form No.53 as stated in the writ petition. Accordingly, it is dismissed.
No costs.
Learned AGA to file Memo of Appearance within two weeks from today.
Sd/- JUDGE Srl.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

B G Gopal vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • S N Satyanarayana