Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Aziz Ahmad vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|22 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 6007 of 2019 Petitioner :- Aziz Ahmad Respondent :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Ehtesham Afsar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J. Hon'ble Rajendra Kumar-IV,J.
1. Heard Sri Ehtesham Afsar, learned counsel for petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for State-respondents.
2. Learned counsel for petitioner, despite repeated query, could not show any provision under which permission is required from Collector for repair of existing mosque.
3. If there is some such requirement under bye laws of Local Bodies within whose jurisdiction the mosque in question exists, for that purpose remedy lies before appropriate authority and no such mandamus, in absence of statutory provisions conferring right upon petition to claim such relief, can be granted.
4. Dismissed accordingly.
Order Date :- 22.2.2019
Manish Himwan
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Aziz Ahmad vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
22 February, 2019
Judges
  • Sudhir Agarwal
Advocates
  • Ehtesham Afsar