Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Awanish @ Bholu vs State Of U P Through Its Secretary Home And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 February, 2018
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 29
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 4274 of 2018 Petitioner :- Awanish @ Bholu Respondent :- State Of U.P. Through Its Secretary Home And 2 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Devendra Kumar Singh Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Govind Mathur,J. Hon'ble Rajiv Lochan Mehrotra,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner, learned AGA for the respondents-State and perused the record.
This petition for writ is before us to challenge a notice under Section 3 of the U.P. Control of Goondas Act, 1970. By the notice impugned, the petitioner has been called upon to submit an explanation as to why he be not subjected to an action under sub-Section (3) of Section 3 of the Act of 1970. An explanation too has been filed by the petitioner before the District Magistrate on 16th January, 2018.
In view of the fact that the petitioner has chosen to participate in the proceedings, we do not find any just reason now to interfere with the notice impugned while invoking the powers under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.
The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 23.2.2018 Bhaskar (Rajiv Lochan Mehrotra, J.) (Govind Mathur, J.)
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Awanish @ Bholu vs State Of U P Through Its Secretary Home And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 February, 2018
Judges
  • Govind Mathur
Advocates
  • Devendra Kumar Singh