Ext.P1 order imposing penalty with respect to the year 2007- 08 was interfered by the appellate authority vide Ext.P2, leading to Ext.P2(a) modified order dated 12.12.2013. Being aggrieved of the said order, the petitioner had approached the said authority again, by filing Ext.P3 appeal, Ext.P4 petition for stay and Ext.P5 petition to condone the delay.
2. The case of the petitioner is that, without any regard to the pendency of the above proceedings, coercive proceedings are being pursued against the petitioner, based on the original order, ie, Ext.P1, even contrary to Ext.P2(a). This made the petitioner to approach this Court by filing this writ petition.
3. Heard the learned Government Pleader as well.
4. Considering the facts and circumstances, the 2nd respondent is directed to consider and pass appropriate orders on Exts.P4 and P5 petitions in accordance with law, as expeditiously as possible, at any rate, within 'one month' from the date of receipt of a copy of this judgment. Coercive proceedings, if any, WP(c). No. 28025 of 2014 2 shall be kept in abeyance till such time.
The petitioner shall produce a copy of this judgment along with a copy of this writ petition before the concerned respondent for further steps. The writ petition is disposed of as above.
Sd/-
P.R. RAMACHANDRA MENON, JUDGE.
Pn