1/2 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 12TH DAY OF DECEMBER, 2017 BEFORE THE HON’BLE Dr.JUSTICE VINEET KOTHARI W.P.No.47313/2017 (T-CUS) BETWEEN M/S. AURO LED REPRESENTED BY ITS PARTNER SRI. BRIJESH PATEL S/O SRI. PARSURAM R. PATEL AGED ABOUT 65 YEARS No.6A, LAVELLE MANSION No.1/2, LAVELLE ROAD BENGALURU-560 001.
(BY Mr. ANNAMALAI S. FOR Mr. SHANKAR A, ADVOCATE) AND THE PRINCIPAL COMMISSIONER OF CUSTOMS AIR CARGO COMPLELX & AIR PORT C.R. BUILDINGS, QUEENS ROAD BENGALURU-560 001.
...PETITIONER ...RESPONDENT (BY Mr. JEEVAN J. NEERALGI, ADV.,) THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING DIRECT THE RESPONDENT TO PROVISIONALLY RELEASE THE GOODS SEIZED OF 3370 LED SCREEN PANELS VIDE SEIZURE MEMO DATED 25.5.2017 (REFERRED AS ANNEX-H), DTD.19.6.2017 (REFERERD AS ANNEX-L) AS PER PROVISIONS OF SECTION 110A OF THE CUSTOMS ACT, 1962 & ETC., Date of order 12-12-2017 W.P.No.47313/2017 M/s. Auro Led Vs. The Principal Commissioner of Customs 2/2 THIS PETITION COMING ON FOR ORDERS., THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:
ORDER Mr. Annamalai S, Adv. for Mr. Shankar A, Adv. for Petitioner.
Mr. Jeevan J. Neeralgi, Adv. for Respondent.
Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that the petition has become infructuous as the goods seized by the Respondent has been released under the provisions of Section 110A of the Customs Act, 1962. Therefore, he wants to withdraw the writ petition.
The opposite side has no objection.
The writ petition is dismissed as withdrawn.
Sd/- JUDGE TL