Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Atul Pal vs State Of U.P.

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|12 February, 2021

JUDGMENT / ORDER

1. Heard learned counsel for the accused-applicant as well as learned Additional Government Advocate and gone through the entire record.
2. By means of this application under Section 439 CrPC, the accused-applicant seeks bail in FIR No.0533 of 2019, under Sections 489A, 489B, 489C, 489D, 489E, 419 and 420 IPC lodged at Police Station Tandiyawan, District Hardoi.
It is alleged that from possession of the accused-applicant and co-accused fake currency was recovered along with printer and computer etc; from possession of the accused-applicant fake currency of Rs.30,000/- was recovered, out of total fake currency of Rs.1,26,000/-; the accused-applicant has been languishing in jail since 02.12.2019 i.e. for more than a year; the accused-applicant has criminal history of one case registered at Crime/FIR No.392 of 2015 in which he has been enlarged on bail by this Court.
3. Considering long incarceration of the accused-applicant and without commenting upon merit of the case, I find it to be a fit case for grant of bail.
4. Let applicant-Atul Pal, accused of above-mentioned FIR/crime number, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two local and reliable sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the Court concerned with the following conditions, which are imposed in the interest of justice:-
(i) the applicant(s) shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law;
(ii). the applicant(s) shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code;
(iii). in case, the applicant(s) misuse(s) the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant(s) fail(s) to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code; and
(iv) the applicant(s) shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.
[D.K.Singh,J.] Order Date :- 12.2.2021 MVS/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Atul Pal vs State Of U.P.

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
12 February, 2021
Judges
  • Dinesh Kumar Singh