Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Atiq @ Boni vs State Of U P Through Secretary Home At Lucknow

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|23 December, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 86
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 51986 of 2021 Applicant :- Atiq @ Boni Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. Through Secretary Home At Lucknow Counsel for Applicant :- Shweta Pandey,Punita Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Mohd. Aslam,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.
The present bail application has been filed by the applicant- Atiq @ Boni in Case Crime No. 141 of 2021, under Sections 380, 411, 413 I.P.C., Police Station- Nahtaur, District- Bijnor, with the prayer to enlarge him on bail during trial.
The submission of learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. The applicant is not named in the first information report. The name of the applicant came into light in the confessional statement of co-accused persons who have been enlarged on bail by the lower court. The applicant has criminal history of 17 cases which have been duly explained in para 13 of affidavit filed in support of bail application. There is no early prospect of conclusion of trial. So, the applicant, who is languishing in jail since 30.05.2021, deserves to be released on bail.
Per contra, learned A.G.A. has vehemently opposed the prayer for grant of bail to the applicant but could not point out anything material to the contrary.
Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as also the submissions advanced by learned counsel for the parties, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant is entitled to be released on bail.
The bail application is allowed.
Let applicant- Atiq @ Boni be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions that:-
1. The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence during the trial.
2. The applicant shall not pressurize/intimidate the prosecution witness.
3. The applicant shall appear before the trial court on the date fixed, unless personal presence is exempted.
4. The applicant shall not commit an offence similar to the offence of which he is accused, or suspected, of the commission of which he is suspected.
5. The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade them from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
In case of breach of any of the above condition, the prosecution shall be at liberty to seek cancellation of bail in accordance with law.
The party may file computer generated copy of such order downloaded from the official website of High Court Allahabad, self attested by pairokar of the applicant.
The concerned Court/Authority/Official shall verify the authenticity of such computerized copy of the order from the official website of High Court Allahabad and shall make a declaration of such verification in writing.
Order Date :- 23.12.2021 Vikas Digitally signed by MOHAMMAD ASLAM Date: 2021.12.24 13:30:48 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Atiq @ Boni vs State Of U P Through Secretary Home At Lucknow

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
23 December, 2021
Judges
  • Mohd Aslam
Advocates
  • Shweta Pandey Punita Pandey