Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Atar Singh vs Chairman

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 September, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 36
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 15300 of 2019 Petitioner :- Atar Singh Respondent :- Chairman, U.P. State Road Trnasport Corporation, Lucknow And 4 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Ram Ashish Pandey,Vishnu Gupta(Senior Adv.) Counsel for Respondent :- Awadhesh Kumar Saxena
Hon'ble Mrs. Sunita Agarwal,J.
Heard Sri Vishnu Gupta, learned Senior Advocate assisted by Sri Ram Ashish Pandey, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri A.K. Saxena, learned counsel for the respondent- U.P.S.R.T.C.
At the outset, it is submitted by learned Senior Advocate that only prayer made in the present writ petition is that the petitioner has filed a revision before the Chairman, U.P.S.R.T.C., Lucknow to challenge the Appellate order dated 24.07.2019. The said revision is pending since 19.08.2019. It is contended that the petitioner is about to retire and in case of delay in disposal of his revision, it would be rendered infructuous.
Be that as it may, in view of the innocuous prayer of the petitioner, without expressing any opinion as to the merits of the case, the writ petition is being disposed of with a direction to respondent no.2 i.e. Chairman, U.P.S.R.T.C., Lucknow, to decide the pending revision dated 19.08.2019, as expeditiously as possible, preferably, within a period of two months from the date of submission of certified copy of this order.
Order Date :- 27.9.2019 P Kesari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Atar Singh vs Chairman

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 September, 2019
Judges
  • S Sunita Agarwal
Advocates
  • Ram Ashish Pandey Vishnu Gupta Senior Adv