IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT MADRAS DATED : 30.06.2017 CORAM THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE K.K.SASIDHARAN And THE HONOURABLE MR.JUSTICE M.DHANDAPANI W.A.No.1132 of 2013 And M.P.No.1 of 2013
1. The Assistant Commissioner Kendriya Vidyalaya Sangathan IIT Campus, Chennai – 600 036.
2. The Principal Kendriya Vidyalaya Air Force Station, Avadi, Chennai – 600 055. ... Appellants Vs.
Binoy Kumar Mondal ... Respondent Prayer:
Writ appeal filed under Clause 15 of the Letters Patent praying to set aside the order dated 08.04.2009 in W.P.No.1280 of 2009.
For Appellants : Mr.M.Vaidyanathan For Respondent : Mr.T.Sundaranathan J U D G M E N T (Order of the Court was made by M.DHANDAPANI,J.) This writ appeal has been filed by the appellant seeking to set aside the order dated 08.04.2009 passed in W.P.No.1280 of 2009.
2. Heard the learned counsel appearing for the appellants and the learned counsel appearing for the respondent.
3. The brief facts of the case are as follows: The respondent herein filed writ petition in W.P.No.1280 of 2009 challenging the impugned order therein dated 09.01.2009, wherein, the application made by the respondent for correction of his son's date of birth as 04.04.1994 in the place of 01.04.1994 in the admission register and other school records was rejected. After hearing the arguments advanced on either side, the learned Single Judge of this Court allowed the writ petition by setting aside the impugned order therein and directed the respondents therein to correct the date of birth of the respondent's son. Challenging the same, this intra Court appeal has been filed.
4. Today, when the matter is taken up consideration, the learned counsel appearing for the respondent submitted that pursuant to the order dated 08.04.2009 passed in W.P.No.1280 of 2009, the date of birth of the respondent's son was corrected by the School Authorities and hence, the prayer sought for in this appeal has become infructuous.
5. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel appearing for the respondent, this intra Court appeal is dismissed as infructuous as nothing survives in this appeal for adjudication. No costs. Consequently, the connected miscellaneous petition is also closed.
pri Speaking Order/ Non Speaking Order Index: Yes / No Internet: Yes / No [K.K.S.,J.] [M.D.I.,J.] 30.06.2017 K.K.SASIDHARAN,J.
And M.DHANDAPANI,J.
pri W.A.No.1132 of 2013 And M.P.No.1 of 2013 30.06.2017