IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 9TH DAY OF JANUARY 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ALOK ARADHE WRIT PETITION NOs.9006-9009/2014 (GM-CPC) C/W CIVIL REVISION PETITION NO.231/2015 BETWEEN:
1. M/S ASIANET NEWS NETWORK PVT. LTD. SUVARNA CHANNEL REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGING DIRECTOR & CEO NO.36, OPPOSITE MALLIGE HOSPITAL BEHIND KARNATAKA FILM CHAMBERS CRESCENT ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001 2. PROGRAM DIRECTOR (F.I.R PROGRAM) ASIANET PVT. LTD.
SUVARNA CHANNEL NO.36, OPPOSITE MALLIGE HOSPITAL BEHIND KARNATAKA FILM CHAMBERS CRESCENT ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001 3. PROGRAM MANAGER (F.I.R PROGRAM) ASIANET PVT. LTD.
SUVARNA CHANNEL NO.36, OPPOSITE MALLIGE HOSPITAL BEHIND KARNATAKA FILM CHAMBERS CRESCENT ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001 4. THE PRODUCTION TEAM MANAGER (F.I.R PROGRAM) ASIANET PVT. LTD. SUVARNA CHANNEL NO.36, OPPOSITE MALLIGE HOSPITAL BEHIND KARNATAKA FILM CHAMBERS CRESCENT ROAD BANGALORE – 560 001 P2 TO P4 ARE REPRESENTED BY AJIT HANAMAKKANAVAR … PETITIONERS COMMON (BY SRI ANAND MUTTALI, ADVOCATE [ABSENT]) AND:
1. DR. JYOTHI PRAMOD W/O A.PRAMOD ROY AGED ABOUT 45 YEARS PROPRIETOR M/S DR. JYOTHI PRAMOD HOSPITAL M.G.ROAD, RAMNAGAR RAMNAGAR DISTRICT – 571 511 2. SRI VENKATESH S/O DASSAPPA MAJOR, NO.14123 BALAGIRIHALLIMARA RAMNAGARAM – 571 511 3. SMT. UMADEVI W/O VENKATESH MAJOR, NO.14123 BALAGIRIHALLIMARA RAMNAGARAM – 571 511 … RESPONDENTS COMMON (BY SRI VARDHAMAN V. GUNJAL, ADVOCATE FOR R1; NOTICE TO R2 & R3 IS DISPENSED WITH VIDE C/O DATED 25.02.2014 IN WP NOS.9006-9009/2014; R2 & R3 ARE SERVED AND UNREPRESENTED IN CRP NO.231/2015) - - -
THESE WRIT PETITIONS ARE FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 & 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA PRAYING TO QUASH THE ORDER DATED 20.07.2013 (ANNEXURE-F) PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RAMANAGARA ON THE APPLICATION IN O.S.NO.264/2008.
THIS CIVIL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 115 OF CPC PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 31.03.2015 (ANNEXURE-A) PASSED BY THE COURT OF THE ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE, RAMANAGAR ON THE APPLICATION IN O.S.NO.264/2008.
THESE WRIT PETITIONS COMING ON FOR PRELIMINARY HEARING IN ‘B’ GROUP AND THE CRP COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING:-
ORDER None had appeared on behalf of the petitioners on 04.12.2018 as well as on 18.12.2018. Today also, when the matter is called, none had appeared on behalf of the petitioners. It appears that the petitioners are not interested in prosecuting these petitions. Accordingly, the writ petitions and the civil revision petition are dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- JUDGE LB