Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Gujarat
  4. /
  5. 2012
  6. /
  7. January

Ashwinkumar vs N.M.Joshi

High Court Of Gujarat|30 April, 2012

JUDGMENT / ORDER

The applicant has taken out present application seeking below mentioned reliefs:-
"11A to allow this application, for joining the applicant as party respondent.
B to direct the registry to array and implead the applicant as party respondent No.10, and cause title may accordingly be amended."
2. The records shows that a copy of the application has been served to the learned advocates representing the opponents.
3. Mr.
Bambhania, learned advocate, has appeared for the applicant. He has submitted that the learned advocates representing the opponents have no objection, if the reliefs, as prayed for by the applicant, is granted.
4. Besides this, from the submissions made by the learned advocate for the applicant and from the record, it appears that the issues involved in the writ petition are related to promotion, seniority and select list and interpretation of relevant provisions and the applicant herein apprehends that his right or prospects may be affected, which are involved in and are principal subject matter of the petition. Therefore, so as to protect his interest, the applicant wants to be impleaded as party respondent in the proceedings of writ petition being Special Civil Application No.16114 of 2005.
5. Having regard to the subject matter of the writ petition and the averments made in present application as well as submissions made by learned advocate for the applicant and for the foregoing reasons, it appears that the application deserves to be allowed in terms of paragraph 11A and B.
6. Though learned advocates for the other side are not present when the application is called out and taken up for hearing. In view of the submissions made by learned advocate for the applicant (as recorded hereinabove) and considering the subject matter, present application is disposed of at this stage with below mentioned order.
6.1 The application is allowed in terms of paragraph No.11A and B.
6.2 Necessary amendment shall be carried out accordingly within period of 10 days.
6.3 It is clarified that if any of the opponents has any objection against present order, then, it would be open to the concerned opponents to take out appropriate application seeking modification of present order.
With the aforesaid observations, clarifications and direction, present application stands disposed of.
(K.M.Thaker, J.) kdc Top
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ashwinkumar vs N.M.Joshi

Court

High Court Of Gujarat

JudgmentDate
30 April, 2012