Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2014
  6. /
  7. January

Ashok Kumar vs District Magistrate, Pratapgarh ...

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|24 February, 2014

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Hon'ble Mahendra Dayal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the parties.
After arguing the matter at length, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that he does not want to press the reliefs claimed in the writ petition but restricts his prayer only to the extent that the representation dated 03.02.2014 preferred by the petitioner, contained in Annexure No. 5 to the writ petition, may be directed to be decided, to which learned Chief Standing Counsel has no objection.
Accordingly without entering into the merits of the case writ petition is disposed of finally with a direction to the District Magistrate, District-Pratapgarh to consider and decide the pending representation of the petitioner, contained in Annexure No. 5 to the writ petition, within a period of three months from the date of certified copy of this order is produced before him, after affording opportunity of hearing to the petitioner.
Order Date :- 24.2.2014 Anurag/-
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ashok Kumar vs District Magistrate, Pratapgarh ...

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
24 February, 2014
Judges
  • Rajiv Sharma
  • Mahendra Dayal