Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Ashish Srivas vs State Of U P And Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|07 April, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 40
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. WRIT PETITION No. - 2726 of 2021 Petitioner :- Ashish Srivas Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Hare Krishna Tripathi Counsel for Respondent :- G.A.
Hon'ble Manoj Misra,J.
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner; learned A.G.A. for the respondents 1 to 3; and perused the record.
The instant petition seeks quashing of the First Information Report dated 19.02.2021 registered as Case Crime No. 24 of 2021, under Sections 363, 366 I.P.C., P.S. Lahchura, District Jhansi.
The allegation in the First Information Report, which has been lodged by the father of the victim Priti Kumar is to the effect that his daughter has been enticed away by the accused.
The petitioner has prayed for quashing of the First Information Report by claiming that the victim Priti Kumar is adult and that she has voluntarily married Ashish Srivas (petitioner). However, there is no satisfactory documentary evidence on record to show that the victim is an adult though reliance has been placed on Adhaar Card of the victim, which discloses her date of birth as 01.01.2001.
The learned A.G.A. has submitted that the date of birth entered in an Aadhar Card has not been conferred any conclusive status by law and, therefore, it would be appropriate that this petition be disposed off by requiring the investigating agency to determine the age of the victim and record the statement of the victim and, thereafter, take appropriate action as per law.
Having perused the record. We do not find any other documentary evidence on the basis of which we could hold the victim to be an adult. As it is not provided by law that the date of birth entered in an Adhaar Card would be conclusive, and we find no document on the basis of which such entry had been made, we deem it appropriate to dispose off this petition by providing as follows:-
The petitioner shall produce the victim (Priti Kumar) before the court of Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate, Jhansi by or before 30.04.2021. Upon her production, the Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate, Jhansi shall proceed to record the statement of Priti Kumari to ascertain whether any force has been used on her or she has been voluntarily in the company of the petitioner. In case the victim deposes before the Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate that force has been used on her, the Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate shall proceed to pass appropriate orders immediately in respect of the custody/protection of the victim. However, in case the victim deposes that she has been voluntarily in the company of the petitioner or any other person and that no force has been used on her, learned Magistrate shall call upon the Investigating Officer of the case and fix a date for appearance of the informant or the parents or natural guardian of the victim for the purpose of determining the age of the victim. On the date so fixed, the learned Magistrate shall proceed to determine the age of the victim as per law, keeping in mind the provisions that are applicable for determination of the age of a victim and may, if necessary, direct for ossification test/medical examination of the victim from a District Government Hospital. If the victim is found to be a minor, the learned Magistrate shall proceed to pass appropriate orders in respect of custody of the victim, as per law. However, in case the victim is found to be an adult, he shall proceed to record the statement of the victim under Section 164 Cr.P.C.
On the basis of the statement of the victim and the age of the victim as determined above, the police shall submit report under Section 173(2) Cr.P.C.
The aforesaid exercise shall be completed preferably within a period of four weeks from the date of production of the victim before the Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate. Till 30.04.2021, or the date on which the victim is produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the petitioner in the above case. Thereafter, if the victim is produced before the Chief Judicial Magistrate/concerned Magistrate, as directed above, the accused shall be dealt with as per the statement of the victim. Though, in the event the victim is found to be minor, the police would be free to take the investigation to its logical conclusion and may effect arrest of the accused.
It is further clarified that if the victim is not produced by the date fixed as above, there shall be no protection and the investigation agency shall be free to take all steps that may be necessary to bring the investigation to its logical conclusion.
With the aforesaid observations/directions, the petition is disposed off. Order Date :- 7.4.2021 Sunil Kr Tiwari
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Ashish Srivas vs State Of U P And Others

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
07 April, 2021
Judges
  • Manoj Misra
Advocates
  • Hare Krishna Tripathi