Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Karnataka
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Asgar Ali Shaik vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

High Court Of Karnataka|17 October, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA AT BENGALURU DATED THIS THE 17TH DAY OF OCTOBER, 2019 BEFORE THE HON’BLE Mr. JUSTICE P.B. BAJANTHRI CRIMINAL PETITION No. 6867/2019 BETWEEN :
Asgar Ali Shaik S/o. late Shaik Abdul Sabu Aged about 50 years No. 875, 31st A Cross Tilaknagar Jayanagar 4th T Block Bengaluru – 560 041. … PETITIONER (By Sri. Yogesh Kumar U.S. Adv.,) AND :
1. The State of Karnataka Rep. by Thilaknagar Police Station Bengaluru – 560 041 Rep. by S.P.P.
High Court Bengaluru - 01.
2. Smt. Noor Zama Begum W/o. Asgar Ali Shaik Aged about 36 years No. 206, 4th Floor 31st Cross Tilaknagar Jayanagar Bengaluru – 560 041. … RESPONDENTS (By Sri. R.D. Renukaradhya, HCGP, for R-1 Sri. H. Jayanth Poojary, Adv. For R-2) ---
This Criminal Petition is filed under Section 482 Cr.P.C. with a prayer to quash the complaint, FIR and entire criminal proceedings in Cr. No. 383/2016 initiated by 1st respondent for the offence punishable under Section 323, 324, 504, 498A R/w. 34 of IPC and etc.
This Criminal Petition coming on for Admission this day, the Court passed the following;
O R D E R In the instant petition the petitioner has sought for the following reliefs:
a. Call for the records.
b. Quash the complaint, FIR and entire criminal proceedings in Crime No. 383/2016 initiated by the 1st respondent for the offence punishable under Sections 323, 324, 504, 498(A) r/w. 34 of Indian Penal Code pending before XXIV Addl. Chief Metropolitan Magistrate, Bengaluru in so far as petitioner is concerned vide Annexure – A, B, C.
2. Petitioner and respondent No. 2 got married about 15 years back. There were certain domestic issues among themselves which has resulted in filing of complaint against the petitioner by respondent No. 2 under Sections 323, 324, 504, 498(A) read with Section 34 IPC wherein 5 persons have been shown as accused. Petitioner herein is accused No. 1. Accused Nos. 2 to 5 have filed independent criminal petitions bearing Nos. 9105/2016 and 8184/2016 and those petitions were allowed on 16.10.2019 in terms of the joint memo/affidavit filed by the parties therein.
3. Today, in the present petition, both petitioner and respondent No. 2 have filed a joint affidavit of settlement amongst themselves. Even though offences are heinous, at the same time having regard to the fact that petitioner and respondent No. 2 are husband and wife, the joint affidavit relating to settlement among themselves is taken on record.
4. Accordingly, FIR in Crime No. 383/2016 is set aside.
Petition is allowed.
Sd/- JUDGE.
LRS.
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Asgar Ali Shaik vs The State Of Karnataka And Others

Court

High Court Of Karnataka

JudgmentDate
17 October, 2019
Judges
  • P B Bajanthri