Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2021
  6. /
  7. January

Arvind Nayak vs State Of U P And Anothers

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|27 October, 2021
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 50
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 17872 of 2021 Applicant :- Arvind Nayak Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Anothers Counsel for Applicant :- Rafeek Ahmad Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Arvind Kumar Mishra-I,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.
This bail anticipatory bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant seeking anticipatory bail in case crime no. 116 of 2021, under Sections - 379, 411 I.P.C., Section - 4/21 Mines and Minerals (Development Regulation) Act, 1957, Police Station - Ajnar, District - Mahoba.
Considering the submissions and taking into consideration the facts and circumstances of the case, no doubt it is an admitted fact from the the perusal of the F.I.R. that applicant was involved in the offence in the question. Therefore, the argument advanced here are argument to be advanced at the stage of regular bail and cannot form the basis of anticipatory bail.
The applicant is free to agitate his claim at the stage of regular bail before the appropriate court.
In view of above, this anticipatory bail application is disposed of.
It is made clear that nothing has been observed by this Court on merits.
Order Date :- 27.10.2021 S Rawat Digitally signed by ARVIND KUMAR MISHRA Date: 2021.10.27 16:04:28 IST Reason: Document Owner Location: High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Arvind Nayak vs State Of U P And Anothers

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
27 October, 2021
Judges
  • Arvind Kumar Mishra I
Advocates
  • Rafeek Ahmad Khan