1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2018
  6. /
  7. January

Arvind Kumar Pandey vs State Of U P & Others

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|11 October, 2018


Court No. - 34
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 17209 of 2002 Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Pandey Respondent :- State Of U.P. & Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Smt. Usha Srivastava,Vinod Kumar Srivastava Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Sudhir Agarwal,J.
1. Called in revise. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this writ petition. Learned Standing Counsel is present for respondents.
2. By means of the present writ petition, petitioner has sought following reliefs:
"issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the respondent Nos.1, 2 and 3 to pay the salary of the petitioner due from 24.10.2000 and onwards regularly."
3. I myself have gone through the pleadings, grounds as also reliefs sought and find that petitioner is not able to make out a case so as to justify interference of this Court by granting reliefs, as prayed for.
4. Moreover, it appears that either the cause of action no more survives or that petitioner has lost interest in this matter or it has otherwise become infructuous and, probably for this reason, none is interested to have decided this matter on merits and that is why, counsel for petitioner is absent.
5. Dismissed. Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 11.10.2018 KA
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.

Arvind Kumar Pandey vs State Of U P & Others


High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

11 October, 2018
  • Sudhir Agarwal
  • Smt Usha Srivastava Vinod Kumar Srivastava