Judgments
Judgments
  1. Home
  2. /
  3. High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad
  4. /
  5. 2019
  6. /
  7. January

Arvind Kumar Chauhan vs State Of U P And Another

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad|26 February, 2019
|

JUDGMENT / ORDER

Court No. - 6
Case :- WRIT - A No. - 3130 of 2019 Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Chauhan Respondent :- State Of U P And Another Counsel for Petitioner :- Vindeshwari Prasad,Vrat Sheel Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Yashwant Varma,J.
Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri Vikram Bahadur Yadav learned Standing Counsel for the State respondents.
The petitioner had applied in the recruitment exercise initiated by the respondents in 2015. He had claimed the benefits of reservation on account of belonging to Other Backward Classes. The certificate however which was presented in support of this claim clearly shows that it was one relating to applicants who were applying for appointment to posts under the Government of India. The said certificate could not possibly be countenanced by the respondents bearing in mind the principles enunciated by the Full Bench of the Court in Gaurav Sharma Vs. State of U.P. And Others [2017(5) ADJ 494]. The petitioner subsequently furnished another OBC certificate issued by the State Government. This certificate however was issued after the last date fixed under the advertisement/notification.
In view of the above, the prayers as made cannot be granted. The writ petition is dismissed.
Order Date :- 26.2.2019 faraz
Disclaimer: Above Judgment displayed here are taken straight from the court; Vakilsearch has no ownership interest in, reservation over, or other connection to them.
Title

Arvind Kumar Chauhan vs State Of U P And Another

Court

High Court Of Judicature at Allahabad

JudgmentDate
26 February, 2019
Judges
  • Yashwant Varma
Advocates
  • Vindeshwari Prasad Vrat Sheel